DFID Management Board


In working towards the delivery of the Public Service Agreement the Management Board will aim to:

  • communicate the vision, role, direction and priorities of DFID to staff and other stakeholders;
  • ensure DFID's financial resources and staff are allocated and managed effectively;
  • monitor and improve DFID's performance;
  • protect and enhance DFID’s reputation as a highly effective international development organisation.

Meeting on 21 November 2006

Topic

Attending

Purpose

MB Obj

Papers

Comprehensive Spending Review (HMT session)

HMT team: Calum Miller and Peter Mc Dermott

Update from HMT on the context, content and timetable of the CSR 07

A,C & D

No papers closed session

Comprehensive Spending Review (DFID progress)

Richard Calvert
Helen Mealins

To review DFID progress on the Comprehensive Spending Review

B, C & D

No papers closed session

Tracking thematic expenditure

Richard Calvert
Liz Ditchburn
 

To agree how DFID will record its expenditure in particular sectors, eg HIV and AIDS

B, C & D

 

Risk Management

Richard Calvert
Simon Gill

To review the new Risk Register and consider next steps on Risk Management

B, C & D

Paper
Annex

Attendees

In AH: Suma Chakrabarti (Chair), Sue Owen, Minouche Shafik, 

In PS: Mark Lowcock, Bill Griffith (Non-Executive Director), Helen Ghosh (Non-Executive Director)


Observers

In PS: Julia Bunting, Quach Thu Huong, Jennie Barugh, Frances Harper, David Reid, Helen Evans, Jane Shute, Siobhan Carey, David Minotti (Capability Review team)

In AH: Caroline Rickatson, Benedicte Terryn, Kate Tench, Kenny Osborne, Tom Andrews


Comprehensive Spending Review (HMT presentation) – closed session

1. The HM Treasury team gave a presentation on the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR). As this was a closed session which included sensitive information, slides are not available. The presentation and discussion covered the context, key elements of the preparations and timetable for the CSR. A key point to note: it was likely that DFID would be asked to manage a 5% per annum real reduction in administration resources (although the final decision would not be made until later, probably as part of the Pre-Budget Report).

Comprehensive Spending Review (DFID discussion) – closed session

2. Richard Calvert introduced this item. The areas discussed were (a) our overall strategy for the CSR bid; (b) assumptions on programme spend; (c) options for how we would manage a 5% real cut to our administration costs.

3. The Board agreed:

  • we should plan to bid for an overall CSR settlement based on straight line growth to 0.7% ODA:GNI;
  • for the time being, we should plan on the basis of multilateral expenditure of £2.9 billion in 2010/11. FCPD to discuss with international divisions how to achieve this (using a series of questions posed by Mark Lowcock in an email of 22 November as a starting point);
  • further decisions on how we would manage a 5% cut in administration resources would be taken at a meeting in the margins of the upcoming SCS day;

Tracking Thematic and Sectoral Expenditure

5. Liz Ditchburn introduced this paper, which asked the Board to agree a broad approach to tracking thematic and sectoral expenditure in DFID. Key features of the approach:

  • there should be a clear FCPD role in determining methodology and baselines and providing expenditure reports, in order to improve consistency and discipline;
  • input sector codes should become the main mechanism for reporting bilateral programme expenditure;
  • budget support should be nominally allocated in proportion with partner government’s own overall expenditure.

6. The Board:

  • commended the team on the quality of the paper;
  • agreed the proposed approach;
  • asked FCPD to include some worked examples in the final piece of work;
  • agreed to highlight this change at the SCS day.

Risk Management

7. Richard Calvert introduced this item.

8. The Board:

  • commended the team on their good work on improving DFID’s Corporate Risk Register;
  • agreed the new format;
  • asked some specific questions about the ratings of particular risks;
  • asked for Climate Change to be included under risk 5 (inadequate flexibility to meet shocks);
  • asked FCPD to investigate what elements of the risk register other Government Departments make public.

Justin Williams
Management Board Secretary