Speech on Malaria by Hilary Benn, Secretary of State for International Development,
15 March 2007.
Related pages:
Malaria
factsheet (248
kb) | Case
study: Ghana’s Integrated Child Health Campaign |
Global
Fund |
UNITAID
|
Africa
‘should boost malaria spending’
Thanks Stephen [O’Brian], and to all of you in this All Party Parliamentary
Group. You’ve done a great job in raising awareness on malaria, and I’m very
pleased to launch this important and timely report. We will be studying the
recommendations with great interest.
You are all malaria experts and are passionate about malaria. But I am sure,
like me, you must be appalled by the continuing impact of this disease. Malaria
kills over 1 million people a year, mostly children in sub-Saharan Africa.
Over 3 billion people are at risk of contracting malaria with up to half a
billion cases a year.
And climate change, one of the new challenges is hardest felt by those least
responsible for it, will increase the spread of malaria.
And it puts huge pressure on health care services - in sub-Saharan Africa it
accounts for around one-third of all outpatient visits and 20-45% of hospital
admissions. This is a considerable burden on nurses, doctors, communities and
families.
Back
to top
Malaria kills people. It makes people ill. It prevents people working.
Economic costs due to malaria in Africa are estimated at US $12 billion a year.
It’s a lot of money.
And it affects the poor and vulnerable most. Up to 30% of malaria deaths in
Africa occur in the wake of war, local violence or other disaster.
Now, we have a pretty large body of evidence of what works both to prevent
and to treat malaria; but we – all of us - have been less successful in ensuring
people have access to these interventions.
So I think we need to do three things:
- Increase funding,
- Do more of what we know works, and
- Do more research.
Back
to top
First, funding for malaria has increased substantially in recent years.
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria has already committed to
spending $2.6 billion on malaria. It now provides 60% of external funding for
malaria. And I’m pleased that we’re one of the fund’s largest donors, and have
committed £359 million of your money through to 2008.
But there are huge demands on the limited budgets of poor countries, and they
need more resources to meet these demands.
In our white paper last year, we committed to allocate at least half of our
bilateral aid to basic services – including health.
And we are working to make sure that this aid is longer-term and more
predictable. Only then will countries have the confidence to expand their health
services, invest in training, recruit additional staff and revitalise their
health infrastructure. Predictability is just as important as amount. That’s why
I pushed for debt cancellation. This allowed Zambia to provide free health care.
Back
to top
We are also a founder member of UNITAID, which supports the provision of
drugs and diagnostics for AIDS, TB and Malaria.
The UK is making a 20-year contribution, starting with £15 million this year,
and, subject to the outcome of a joint assessment of the performance of UNITAID,
rising to £40 million a year by 2010.
So, while we are seeing progress, we need more money, we also need to ensure
that the money we do have is well used and can show improvements in people’s
lives.
We need better information. Reporting on malaria is very poor. We don’t have
good up to date information on deaths from malaria or the number of cases of
malaria and are therefore not well placed to measure the progress made as we
ought to be. We must do better.
Back
to top
Second, we know what works and what needs to be done.
- More vector control strategies including insecticide treated nets
and in-door spraying;
- Prompt and effective treatment of malaria – because malaria kills
quickly.
- Preventive treatment of malaria for pregnant women, and
- Quick management of malaria epidemics;
Yet far too few people have access to these proven interventions. The
challenges are huge.
Prompt treatment with effective drugs is essential for malaria.
But even if the poor can get to a clinic – staff are often not there, drugs are
out of stock or if fees are charged it costs too much. Many buy drugs from a
local shop as it is often much more convenient, but treatment may be of poor
quality. Its about the lack of choice that poor people have.
Back
to top
So we need to make sure the right drugs and treatment are available and
affordable. The malaria parasite is increasingly resistant to chloroquine, which
is cheap and widely available. The newer ACTs are highly effective. But they are
still much more expensive and less widely available.
Health services must be strengthened to ensure that the right drugs are
available at the right time, and in the right place and in ways in which people
can afford.
Insecticide treated nets can reduce child deaths significantly yet despite
progress - and there is progress - most African children don’t sleep under an
insecticide treated net.
But we know progress can be made. The development of long lasting nets that
no longer require re-dipping is an important achievement.
Back
to top
In Malawi, delivery of these nets is combined with other services. A
nationwide programme has been in operation through ante-natal services since
2002. More than 100,000 nets have been delivered every month since the programme
began.
It’s made a real difference, now in some districts, 60% of children sleep
under insecticide treated mosquito nets compared to just 8% in 2000. That is
progress and we need more of it.
And I recently approved £50 million to improve malaria control in Nigeria,
Africa’s most populous country. Malaria is the leading cause of child mortality
in Nigeria, causing a quarter of a million deaths a year. It is also a
significant factor in maternal mortality.
This program will provide subsidized bed nets for poor and vulnerable people,
appropriate ACT treatment for children and preventive treatment of pregnant
women. It aims to directly prevent 220,000 deaths and by working with other
partners, contribute to averting a further 1 million deaths over 5 years. This
shows what can be done when donors and countries come together.
Back
to top
Finally, a vaccine for malaria would truly be a prize but remains some years
away. However, after decades of effort we are seeing very encouraging signs.
Rapid diagnostic tests that do not need sophisticated equipment or training
can be very useful as they allow a diagnosis of malaria to be made at a remote
health facility. But they have limitations and must be improved.
We need new drugs, of course new ACTs, but we also need to look to the future
when the malaria parasite becomes resistant them.
So we are supporting research on new drugs for malaria. Funding the Medicines
for Malaria Venture with £10 million over 5 years from 2005 to 2010, and the
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative with £6.5 million over the next three
years.
On the 1st March 2007 the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative along with
Sanofi Aventis, announced the production of ASAQ, a new drug for malaria that
combines two well known existing drugs. It will cost less than 50 cents for the
treatment of a child.
Back
to top
Now, I think there are two very exciting possibilities on the horizon.
First, we know that lowering the price of ACTs is critical to increasing
access to treatment, particularly in the informal private sector where much
malaria treatment takes place. Kenneth Arrow, a Nobel laureate, has put forward
a very innovative concept on a global subsidy for ACTs. We’re actively involved
in the discussions, and I hope that we can make progress on this.
Second, we’re supporting the piloting of an advance market commitment – where
we help guarantee demand for a vaccine in order to promote private sector
investment – it’s for a pneumococcal vaccine. I was at the launch of the
pneumococcal APPG yesterday. If this proves successful, we anticipate we’ll move
to an advance market commitment for a malaria vaccine – a hugely exciting
possibility. We need an AMC to stimulate research for the poor. We got ARVs
because people in the rich world had AIDS. We now have 1 million Africans on
ARVs. It is not enough but it is progress. We lack paediatric formulations for
ARVs as children in the West don’t get AIDS.
So, we are making progress, and there are exciting possibilities ahead. And
in part this is thanks to you. We are not going to change things unless we make
politics work, and it’s your efforts and those of many others around the world,
who keep up the pressure and push for change. Economic development is our story
. People in developing countries have the same hopes and aspirations. Push for
action so that we end these preventable deaths and suffering, and hand on our
world to our children in a better condition than when we found it.
Back to top
|